Friday, 6 Feb 2026
|
80% of supply chain executives say data quality is one of their top challenges, and yet… spreadsheets, email threads, and PDFs still dominate the freight world. If you've ever cross-checked a BOL against a TMS manually - only to find the wrong PO or arrival window - you're not alone.
The bigger question: Why is freight data still such a mess?
Start with fragmentation. 3PLs, brokers, and shippers each use their own mix of TMS, WMS, ERP, and custom tools. There's no consistent format or protocol. A driver may upload a POD via text, while a warehouse scans it into a WMS. Dispatch might update delivery status in a spreadsheet. The result? Missing context, siloed files, and version control nightmares.
Manual entry adds fuel to the fire. A recent study from Supply Chain Dive found that up to 30% of transportation documents contain some kind of data error. And those errors cost real money - delays, chargebacks, duplicate billing, lost freight, and vendor disputes.
One freight brokerage we spoke with had four full-time employees reviewing inbound documents just to catch mismatched accessorials and detention times. That’s 160 hours a week just reconciling paperwork.
Logistics tech has evolved fast, but not always together. TMS platforms have improved route optimization and pricing, but integrating with a carrier's ELD or a port’s visibility tool? Still clunky.
E-commerce also pushed the industry toward more frequent, lower-volume shipments—think LTL, final mile, same-day delivery—and that complexity puts pressure on existing data systems. A single load might pass through five systems just to get a delivery timestamp confirmed. That’s a lot of sync points, and every handoff is a risk.
Add mergers, outsourcing, and global trade shifts, and you've got a data landscape that's reactive instead of connected.
Fixing freight data issues starts with centralization and automation. Structured data capture—via APIs, smart document parsing, or EDI normalization—can be a game changer.
Instead of relying on emailed BOL PDFs, operators can use OCR tools to extract info in real time. Instead of manually updating shipment milestones in a spreadsheet, event triggers can populate the TMS automatically. It reduces human error, speeds up processing, and unlocks downstream value.
But this requires more than tools. It takes change management. Operations teams need workflows that encourage clean inputs, standard naming conventions, and real incentives to phase out time-wasting habits.
One large 3PL we worked with implemented auto-tagging on inbound BOL documents, trained staff on structured issue codes, and connected their WMS and TMS tools via API. The result? On-time billing improved by 27% in six months.
At Debales.ai, we're building freight data infrastructure that doesn’t just digitize information - it makes it usable. Our platform automatically ingests unstructured freight documents like BOLs, PODs, and rate cons, then cleans and syncs that data across key systems like your TMS, WMS, and ERP.
By turning email chains and PDFs into structured data, we help 3PL teams catch carrier errors faster, reconcile charges in seconds, and reduce billing cycle times by over 40%.
We're not another dashboard. We’re the connective tissue that makes your existing workflow smarter and faster.
Ready to clean up your freight ops? Here are a few high-impact moves:
Every hour spent chasing down document errors or reconciling shipment records is profit lost. With cleaner freight data, logistics teams can stop firefighting and start optimizing.
Structured, connected data doesn't just reduce errors—it unlocks automation, faster customer service, and stronger margins.
And in a margin-tight business like logistics, that's not just nice to have. It’s the competitive edge.
Friday, 6 Feb 2026
BOL errors cause delays, chargebacks, and hours of rework. Here's why they persist and how logistics leaders can stop the bleed.